[DRBD-user] 2nd try of reducing size...

Trevor Hemsley themsley at voiceflex.com
Mon May 28 18:57:05 CEST 2012

Note: "permalinks" may not be as permanent as we would like,
direct links of old sources may well be a few messages off.


On 28/05/12 17:53, Christian Völker wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> as I was (lucky!) able to recover from my firt failed attempt I'll give
> it now a second try.
>
> I have drbd 8.3 running on top of LVM.
>
> I have already reduced the filesystem (ext3) size on the drbd0 device as
> well as the drbd0 device itself (I suppose I have ;-)). My last attempt
> to reduce the LVM backing device ended up in I/O errors for drbd :(
>
> So as I said I've already reduced the drbd (with the reduce command) and
> it's running fine:
> [root at drbd ~]# cat /proc/drbd
> version: 8.3.12 (api:88/proto:86-96)
> GIT-hash: e2a8ef4656be026bbae540305fcb998a5991090f build by
> dag at Build64R6, 2011-11-20 10:57:03
>  0: cs:Connected ro:Secondary/Primary ds:UpToDate/UpToDate A r-----
>     ns:0 nr:2147352908 dw:2147352908 dr:0 al:0 bm:131064 lo:0 pe:0 ua:0
> ap:0 ep:1 wo:d oos:0
>
> And the filesystem is at a smaller size, too. The e2fsck (including bad
> blocks check) runs fine without errors.
>
> So I assume everything here is everything fine so far and I should able
> to reduce the backing device, shouldn't I?

Is your LVM on top of DRBD or is your DRBD on top of LVM?





More information about the drbd-user mailing list