[DRBD-user] "PingAck not received" messages

Matthew Bloch matthew at bytemark.co.uk
Fri May 25 02:10:34 CEST 2012

Note: "permalinks" may not be as permanent as we would like,
direct links of old sources may well be a few messages off.


On 24/05/12 14:32, Florian Haas wrote:
>> Arguably a customer running a heavily interactive system to very remote
>> destinations shouldn't be using such a complex I/O stack and should use
>> dedicated hardware.  This is a pragmatic, expensive, unambitious arguemnt
>> :-)  But drbd+LVM has worked very well for them for 18 months, and the peace
>> of mind of being able to start their customers' VMs in one of two places
>> makes diagnosing this properly worth the effort.
> 
> It would still be interesting to find out whether you ever saw these
> random disconnects with protocol C, or whether this appears to be a
> B-only issue.

I might make that change if it happens again - sortof annoying to lose a
difficult bug as I'm pinning it down but I'll take the quieter life for
now :)

-- 
Matthew


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 262 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.linbit.com/pipermail/drbd-user/attachments/20120525/bdad618b/attachment.pgp>


More information about the drbd-user mailing list