Note: "permalinks" may not be as permanent as we would like,
direct links of old sources may well be a few messages off.
> Interesting. For 8 kB blocks, 703 kB/s means 87 IO/s, or > 5272 IO/min. Sounds like a 7200 RPM drive, with some overhead. Nope. 10k RPM drives in this case. The 8k reads are small enough that they created a lot more journal traffic than you'd normally like. A watched iostat showed about 165 IOPS, which is what you'd expect there. > I'm having a hard time thinking of a way to test your RAID > controller's behavior that isn't harder than just testing on > a regular SATA drive, which has caching semantics that are well > known. Unfortunately no machine I have access to has just plain drives to confirm results like you're claiming. Every cache/writethrough/flushing combo I've thrown at it reacted as expected in our case. I tried though. :) Maybe someone with a regular old desktop and 7200 RPM drives will pipe in eventually, but I'm out of ideas. I'm willing to wager it's just your setup though. For one reason or another. ______________________________________________ See http://www.peak6.com/email_disclaimer/ for terms and conditions related to this email