Note: "permalinks" may not be as permanent as we would like,
direct links of old sources may well be a few messages off.
On Fri, Jun 08, 2012 at 03:31:28PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > The tests here aren't correct. It should be doing a shift before doing > the bitwise AND. (bme->flags & BME_NO_WRITES) is always false and > (bme->flags & BME_LOCKED) checks for BME_NO_WRITES instead of checking > for locked. > > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter at oracle.com> Ack. > --- > I sent this to the drbd-user list in March, but never recieved a > response. Sorry, seems to have been lost :-( Lars > diff --git a/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_proc.c b/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_proc.c > index 2959cdf..ffe1ee4 100644 > --- a/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_proc.c > +++ b/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_proc.c > @@ -187,8 +187,10 @@ static void resync_dump_detail(struct seq_file *seq, struct lc_element *e) > struct bm_extent *bme = lc_entry(e, struct bm_extent, lce); > > seq_printf(seq, "%5d %s %s\n", bme->rs_left, > - bme->flags & BME_NO_WRITES ? "NO_WRITES" : "---------", > - bme->flags & BME_LOCKED ? "LOCKED" : "------" > + test_bit(BME_NO_WRITES, &bme->flags) ? > + "NO_WRITES" : "---------", > + test_bit(BME_LOCKED, &bme->flags) ? > + "LOCKED" : "------" > ); > } -- : Lars Ellenberg : LINBIT | Your Way to High Availability : DRBD/HA support and consulting http://www.linbit.com