Note: "permalinks" may not be as permanent as we would like,
direct links of old sources may well be a few messages off.
On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 04:17:27PM -0700, Kim Ebert wrote: > Is it possible to have an active active configuration using stacked > resources? > > This wasn't clear to me in the documentation. > > Something like, > > Node A Active \ > Node B / R0 > Node C Active \ > Node D / R1 > > R0 Active \ > R1 Active / R2 > > Access stacked resource at R2. Works, but, as always, with dual primary, you have to get the fencing and stonith right! [pri] <----> [pri] | | v v [sec] <----- [pri] [pri] -----> [sec] Depending on your requirements, the latency behaviour will look bad, though. Does not work: [pri] <----> [pri] | | v v [pri] <----> [pri] [pri] <----> [pri] As changes originating on the leaves can not travel to the other end. What would you like to do? -- : Lars Ellenberg : LINBIT | Your Way to High Availability : DRBD/HA support and consulting http://www.linbit.com DRBD® and LINBIT® are registered trademarks of LINBIT, Austria.