Note: "permalinks" may not be as permanent as we would like,
direct links of old sources may well be a few messages off.
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 6:08 PM, Lars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg at linbit.com> wrote: > On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 04:40:57PM +0100, Lars Ellenberg wrote: >> On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 08:16:15PM +0100, Florian Haas wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > DRBD 8.3.12 on CentOS 6.2; SDP from kernel-ib-1.5.3, built locally >> >> You too, of all people? >> >> Something crops up, and since DRBD is used at the same time, >> it has to be DRBD's fault? I was going to ask where in my post you read that. > And you can try a patch: > > diff --git a/drbd/drbd_receiver.c b/drbd/drbd_receiver.c > index 0e55c45..7decee3 100644 > --- a/drbd/drbd_receiver.c > +++ b/drbd/drbd_receiver.c > @@ -528,6 +528,7 @@ STATIC int drbd_accept(struct drbd_conf *mdev, const char **what, > goto out; > } > (*newsock)->ops = sock->ops; > + __module_get((*newsock)->ops->owner); > > out: > return err; Thanks. I'll have to get the customer's permission to try this out on their hardware though, so it might be a couple of days before I get back to you. If they decline I'll just spin up testes box that replicate over IPv6. Thanks again for the quick patch though. Cheers, Florian -- Need help with High Availability? http://www.hastexo.com/now