[DRBD-user] DRBD - one half of Proxmox cluster miscommunicating

Christian Balzer chibi at gol.com
Wed Aug 1 06:30:57 CEST 2012

Note: "permalinks" may not be as permanent as we would like,
direct links of old sources may well be a few messages off.

On Tue, 31 Jul 2012 16:54:48 +0100 James Gibbon wrote:

> On Tue, 31 Jul 2012 17:21:14 +0200
> Felix Frank <ff at mpexnet.de> wrote:
> > On 07/31/2012 05:19 PM, James Gibbon wrote:
> > > Is that right?
> > 
> > Yes.
> > 
> > I'd still consider losing the split brain resolution option.
> > 
> Many thanks, Felix. This has all been a useful learning experience
> as well as a problem resolution resource. I'm going to run the fix
> shortly.
> One last question: why does /proc/drbd on the broken node show as
> "UpToDate" in /proc/drbd? Is that because it's a primary, and not
> able to communicate with the other side, therefore it's entitled to
> consider itself current?
Yes, in its little universe, it is the king. ^o^

The "drbadm connect --discard-my-data all" will take care of that false
assumption. ^.^


Christian Balzer        Network/Systems Engineer                
chibi at gol.com   	Global OnLine Japan/Fusion Communications

More information about the drbd-user mailing list