Note: "permalinks" may not be as permanent as we would like,
direct links of old sources may well be a few messages off.
thanks, Chris. I had turned off disk-barrier and disk-flushes in config file, but there is no difference. And I use the oflag=direct to test, there is not faster than ever. [para]# dd if=/dev/zero of=test1 bs=1M count=1000 conv=fdatasync oflag=direct 1000+0 records in 1000+0 records out 1048576000 bytes (1.0 GB) copied, 25.4056 seconds, 41.3 MB/s [para]# dd if=/dev/zero of=test1 bs=1M count=1000 oflag=direct 1000+0 records in 1000+0 records out 1048576000 bytes (1.0 GB) copied, 27.502 seconds, 38.1 MB/s [para]# echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches [para]# dd if=/dev/zero of=test1 bs=1M count=1000 oflag=direct 1000+0 records in 1000+0 records out 1048576000 bytes (1.0 GB) copied, 25.6661 seconds, 40.9 MB/s [para]# dd if=/dev/zero of=test1 bs=1M count=1000 oflag=direct 1000+0 records in 1000+0 records out 1048576000 bytes (1.0 GB) copied, 25.5987 seconds, 41.0 MB/s From: Chris Dickson Date: 2012-04-25 22:35 To: feng zheng CC: drbd-user Subject: Re: [DRBD-user] drbd write performance slow, per disk 40M/s by dd command Try turning off disk-barrier and disk-flushes and see if that makes a difference. 2012/4/25 feng zheng <zf5984599 at gmail.com> hi, dear all: When I use drbd, I found the write performance very slow, against testing without drbd module. 1. the environment: -) CentOS 5.6 -) 2.6.18 kernel -) drbd 8.4.1 -) drbd.conf: resource r0 { protocol B; net { max-buffers 8000; max-epoch-size 8000; sndbuf-size 512K; } disk { al-extents 3389; } on OSS211 { device /dev/drbd0; disk /dev/sdb1; address 192.168.100.231:7788; meta-disk internal; } on OSS213 { device /dev/drbd0; disk /dev/sde1; address 192.168.100.213:7788; meta-disk internal; } } 2. Test scenario: *) without drbd module, dd to write 1G stream into one disk, which formatted to ext3: [para]# !echo echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches [para]# !dd dd if=/dev/zero of=test1 bs=1M count=1000 conv=fdatasync 1000+0 records in 1000+0 records out 1048576000 bytes (1.0 GB) copied, 10.9905 seconds, 95.4 MB/s *) with drbd module, dd 1G stream to the disk, which is ext3 too: [para]# cat /proc/drbd version: 8.4.1 (api:1/proto:86-100) GIT-hash: 91b4c048c1a0e06777b5f65d312b38d47abaea80 build by root at OSS213, 2012-04-16 21:38:36 0: cs:Connected ro:Primary/Secondary ds:UpToDate/UpToDate B r----- ns:1260036 nr:0 dw:1260036 dr:297 al:330 bm:0 lo:0 pe:0 ua:0 ap:0 ep:1 wo:b oos:0 [para]# [para]# dd if=/dev/zero of=test1 bs=1M count=1000 conv=fdatasync 1000+0 records in 1000+0 records out 1048576000 bytes (1.0 GB) copied, 26.7392 seconds, 39.2 MB/s [para]# cat /proc/drbd version: 8.4.1 (api:1/proto:86-100) GIT-hash: 91b4c048c1a0e06777b5f65d312b38d47abaea80 build by root at OSS213, 2012-04-16 21:38:36 0: cs:Connected ro:Primary/Secondary ds:UpToDate/UpToDate B r----- All the upper test writing disk are same. From the upper result, if i use DRBD to test, the performance is 39 MB/s; while if i do not use, the performance is about 95M/s. 3. My question is: -) this write performance decays so large is normal or not? I had read the following from the DRBD website: "15.1. Hardware considerations: .... A single, reasonably recent, SCSI or SAS disk will typically allow streaming writes of roughly 40MB/s to the single disk." But this is very slow. -)if this is not normal, how can i turn this? is the config file something not correct? thanks a lot BRs, feng _______________________________________________ drbd-user mailing list drbd-user at lists.linbit.com http://lists.linbit.com/mailman/listinfo/drbd-user -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.linbit.com/pipermail/drbd-user/attachments/20120426/1864c346/attachment.htm>