Note: "permalinks" may not be as permanent as we would like,
direct links of old sources may well be a few messages off.
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 5:32 PM, Lars Ellenberg wrote: > > Maybe you don't need dual primary anyways? > Very few installations actually do. In case of failure recovery capabilities, ok. If you want to cover also situations of planned maintenance where you have to update BIOS of your hypervisor and don't want to give downtime to VM users and so you want to go through live migration, I think dual-primary is still needed... or did I miss anything? Thanks, Gianluca