Note: "permalinks" may not be as permanent as we would like,
direct links of old sources may well be a few messages off.
> Okay, I see we're thinking along the same lines... But why > would the quorum server need to be in a third data center? > The stranded server in the secondary data center would > release its resources, while the two servers that can still > talk to each other in the primary data center should be fine, right? > Never mind, that was sort of a premature question. Obviously the reason you suggested a third data center was to allow automatic failover in case the primary data center went offline. But if that happens and I don't mind having to intervene and manually promote the secondary server to primary, then I don't see the need for the third data center. Am I missing something? --Eric Disclaimer - March 31, 2011 This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for Robinson, Eric,Matt Graham,drbd-user at lists.linbit.com. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute, copy or alter this email. Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author and might not represent those of Physicians' Managed Care or Physician Select Management. Warning: Although Physicians' Managed Care or Physician Select Management has taken reasonable precautions to ensure no viruses are present in this email, the company cannot accept responsibility for any loss or damage arising from the use of this email or attachments. This disclaimer was added by Policy Patrol: http://www.policypatrol.com/