Note: "permalinks" may not be as permanent as we would like,
direct links of old sources may well be a few messages off.
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 09:07:32AM +0000, Holger Kiehl wrote: > Hello, > > On Mon, 10 Jan 2011, Holger Kiehl wrote: > > >Hello, > > > >upgrading kernel on secondary from 2.6.36.2 to 2.6.37 gives me the > >following error on primary: Which means you are using the in-kernel DRBD module? Or the out-of-tree drbd source code, and just upgraded the kernel anyways? Does this occur in "mixed version" mode only, different drbd and/or kernel versions on both nodes, or with both nodes on the identical version(s)? > Mar 25 08:53:00 obelix kernel: block drbd0: BAD! BarrierAck #1224296926 received, expected #1224296925! > Mar 25 08:54:20 obelix kernel: block drbd0: BAD! BarrierAck #1861867747 received, expected #1861867746! > Mar 25 08:54:35 obelix kernel: block drbd0: BAD! BarrierAck #4040326970 received, expected #4040326969! > Mar 25 08:56:21 obelix kernel: block drbd0: BAD! BarrierAck #1235958129 received, expected #1235958128! > Mar 25 08:57:31 obelix kernel: block drbd0: BAD! BarrierAck #4096191267 received, expected #4096191266! > Mar 25 08:58:51 obelix kernel: block drbd0: BAD! BarrierAck #1578973016 received, expected #1578973015! > Mar 25 08:59:26 obelix kernel: block drbd0: BAD! BarrierAck #4131468500 received, expected #4131468499! > Mar 25 09:00:08 obelix kernel: block drbd0: BAD! BarrierAck #4013314144 received, expected #4013314143! > Mar 25 09:01:19 obelix kernel: block drbd0: BAD! BarrierAck #2538005992 received, expected #2538005991! > > Kernel 2.6.36.x is working without this problem. Any idea what is causing > this? What other information is required to solve this issue? -- : Lars Ellenberg : LINBIT | Your Way to High Availability : DRBD/HA support and consulting http://www.linbit.com DRBD® and LINBIT® are registered trademarks of LINBIT, Austria. __ please don't Cc me, but send to list -- I'm subscribed