Note: "permalinks" may not be as permanent as we would like,
direct links of old sources may well be a few messages off.
Hello, a the moment I am using a Master-Master setup of DRBD with the following policies, if split brain is detected: after-sb-0pri discard-least-changes; after-sb-1pri discard-secondary; after-sb-2pri call-pri-lost-after-sb; These policies are passable for my setup, I know about the risks. However I am confused about the behaviour of rr-conflict in this scenario. If I use for example... rr-conflict disconnect; ... what would happen, in case I have a "after-sb-2pri" split-brain (network lost)? The documentation says about rr-conflict: "This option helps to solve the cases when the outcome of the resync decision is incompatible with the current role assignment in the cluster." And "discard-least-changes" is defined as: "Auto sync from the node that touched more blocks during the split brain situation." So will there be a sync or disconnect in my case? And is it right, that "role assignment" means Primary/Secondary Role? Thanks for every reply, that helps me to understand that topic. Michael -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Behaviour-of-rr-conflict-in-Master-Master-setup-tp32081635p32081635.html Sent from the DRBD - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.