Note: "permalinks" may not be as permanent as we would like,
direct links of old sources may well be a few messages off.
> Hi, > > Thanks for your patience. > I think we have a missunderstanding. > My scenario is like that: > I have three different vm's, each one offering a different > service. I'd like to have each vm high available. I have only > two nodes, each one with a hardware raid 5: > > [ Node 1 ] [ Node 2 ] > | | > [HW RAID5] [HW RAID5] > | | > [Partition] [Partition] > | | > [ PV1 ] [ PV1 ] > | | > [ VG1 ] [ VG1 ] > | | > [ LV1 ] [ LV1 ] > | | > [ DRBD1 ]-----[ DRBD1 ] > | | > [ VM1A ] [ VM1B ] > > VM1A and VM1B are identical VM's, offering the same service ! > > > Second VM (second service): > > [ Node 1 ] [ Node 2 ] > | | > [HW RAID5] [HW RAID5] > | | > [Partition] [Partition] > | | > [ PV1 ] [ PV1 ] > | | > [ VG1 ] [ VG1 ] > | | > [ LV2 ] [ LV2 ] > | | > [ DRBD2 ]-----[ DRBD2 ] > | | > [ VM2A ] [ VM2B ] > > VM2A and VM2B are identical VM's, offering another service. > And so on for further vm's (further services) ... > Hi, now one more question: Do i need cLVM for this scenario ? Bernd