[DRBD-user] Fwd: small patch for drbddisk

Lars Ellenberg lars.ellenberg at linbit.com
Wed Sep 1 10:49:00 CEST 2010

Note: "permalinks" may not be as permanent as we would like,
direct links of old sources may well be a few messages off.

On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 02:10:55PM +0900, Junko IKEDA wrote:
> Hi,
> sorry for covering old ground.
> http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/drbd/users/19746
> > We should catch that one, probably, and irgnore it at least for monitor
> > (role, status, dstate, etc.) and "down" related commands (secondary,
> > disconnect, detach), or handle it more gracefully in some yet to be
> > Maybe we should add such a loop to drbddisk as well.
> > Or somehow set it up as a wrapper around the ocf agent (though that may
> > not be easily possible).
> >
> > Yes, your patch is ok.
> > Still I'm not taking it as such, but probably make drbdsetup more robust
> > in face of file system problems on /var/lock/, and add a monitoring loop
> > to drbddisk instead.
> Do you have any good idea for handling /var/lock?

For the EROFS on open(/var/lock/*),
just put /var/lock on tmpfs and be happy.

For the drbddisk script, yes, we probably should stop lying
	# other error, may be syntax error in config file,
	# anything else: to not confuse heartbeat further,
	# and avoid reboot due so "failed stop recovery",
	# pretend that we succeeded in stopping this.

As you seem to rather have the reboot due to failed stop recovery
in any case, yep, lets have it.

: Lars Ellenberg
: LINBIT | Your Way to High Availability
: DRBD/HA support and consulting http://www.linbit.com

DRBD® and LINBIT® are registered trademarks of LINBIT, Austria.
please don't Cc me, but send to list   --   I'm subscribed

More information about the drbd-user mailing list