Note: "permalinks" may not be as permanent as we would like,
direct links of old sources may well be a few messages off.
How big a deal would it be to change the message from: "block drbd1: istiod1[3401] Concurrent local write detected! [DISCARD L] new: 42624s +512; pending: 42624s +512" to: "block drbd1: istiod1[3401] Concurrent local write detected! [DISCARD L] new: 42624s +512; pending: 42624s +512 delta: 0" where delta is the number of bytes that were in the overlapped area which are not equal to the I/O already in the queue. So, if the delta is zero, nobody should care (except the ID10-t who wrote it twice) and if it's non-zero then the message implies much more diligent research needs to be done into the calling application. c++ coders, thoughts? (Maybe the original contents of the buffer are gone and my question is moot). Dan in Atlanta