Note: "permalinks" may not be as permanent as we would like,
direct links of old sources may well be a few messages off.
> Or could this have occurred before B was shut down? Such was my assumption. > Yes, but after writes occur to A while B is down, B is out of date even > if B doesn't know it. A knows :-) > That makes sense to me. It's what I would expect. But it doesn't seem > to fit what klaus.mailinglists at pernau.at is describing. Now that you point that out once more, it does seem strange that A considered itself not UpToDate. I had been under the wrong impression that A was shut down before B. This probably renders my earlier ramblings futile. I would like to see pertinent log entries from node A regarding the broken resource, especially from the time immediately before and after A's reboot, and around B's shutdown. Thanks for pointing out that mistake. Regards, Felix