Note: "permalinks" may not be as permanent as we would like,
direct links of old sources may well be a few messages off.
On Thursday 05 August 2010 09:42:13 Rohit Upadhyay wrote: > What is the advantage of DRBD's own protocol over iSCSI? > Given the availability of iSCSI initiator & target, what was the reason to > go to the length of developing own protocol? > > On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 9:15 PM, Mike Lovell <mike at dev-zero.net> wrote: > > Rohit Upadhyay wrote: > > > > Thanks Mike for answering. Another query: > > > > How is transport between 2 machines handled? What protocol is used in > > place of iSCSI / NBD? > > Can it work without DRBD installed on other side? > > > > the transport is TCP. the protocol is its own protocol. it needs drbd > > installed and configured on the remote side. > > > > mike > Less overhead. B.