Note: "permalinks" may not be as permanent as we would like,
direct links of old sources may well be a few messages off.
Joseph L. Casale a écrit : > >> What about using both ? >> > > Why, what would that accomplish? > It could be a way to allocated bandwidth per resource, but in case of several resources need to synchronize, the global may be used for a global limitation. For example: common { syncer { rate 20M; [...] } [...] } resource r1 syncer { rate 10M; [...] } [...] } resource r2 syncer { rate 15M; [...] } [...] } So I define my maximum bandwidth at 20M in the common part. This is due to my network. Because of the limitation of the disks of r1, I define a bandwidth at 10M for this resource, and because of the limitation of the disks of r2, I define a bandwidth at 15M for this resource. Thus: - If r1 has to be synchronized, my bandwidth will be 10M. - If r2 has to be synchronized, my bandwidth will be 15M. - If r1 and r2 have to be synchronized, my bandwidth will be 20M (and not 10+15=25M). -- Hervé GAUTIER