[DRBD-user] Diconnected drbd as very fast backup solution ?

Jakov Sosic jakov.sosic at srce.hr
Sun Oct 18 02:28:25 CEST 2009

Note: "permalinks" may not be as permanent as we would like,
direct links of old sources may well be a few messages off.

On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 14:13:21 +0200
Christoph Adomeit <Christoph.Adomeit at gatworks.de> wrote:

> What I want to know: is there anything wrong with running a drbd
> cluster where the second node is disconnected most of the time ? Will
> some memory or buffers run out of space or such things ? Is the
> performance of a disconnected drbd disk far slower than the
> performance of a native lvm volume ? Is there any other reason why I
> should not use this setup in this use case ?

I cannot answer to those questions, but I would like to see some howto
written for the scenario you described. If you could post it somewhere,
it would be great!

|    Jakov Sosic    |    ICQ: 28410271    |   PGP: 0x965CAE2D   |
| start fighting cancer -> http://www.worldcommunitygrid.org/   |

More information about the drbd-user mailing list