[DRBD-user] conundrum

Scott Inderlied scott at northwestcomputer.biz
Sun Jun 28 11:55:18 CEST 2009

Note: "permalinks" may not be as permanent as we would like,
direct links of old sources may well be a few messages off.


How much risk does this entail? Is the git image stable enough for production use?

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ante Karamatić [mailto:ivoks at grad.hr]
> Sent: Sunday, June 28, 2009 04:23
> To: Scott Inderlied
> Cc: drbd-user at lists.linbit.com
> Subject: Re: [DRBD-user] conundrum
> 
> Scott Inderlied wrote:
> 
> > I'm not concerned about whether it will work or not as is. I'd simply like
> > to take advantage of an advancement if advantages accrue. For me it's really
> > more of a question of the difficulty upgrading later may pose. If I install
> > now with the latest stable DRBD and heartbeat2 and wish to upgrade sometime
> > in the future, will this present great difficulties? I may not want to
> > upgrade with this new release, but probably will at some point (v. 9
> > perhaps), and I wish to avoid as many problems as I can which could result
> > in downtime.
> 
> Since heartbeat2 isn't being developed any more and is, practically,
> being replaced with pacemaker, I'd suggest using pacemaker+openais and
> latest git snapshot of drbd8. git snapshot has only one patch against
> 8.3.2rc2.




More information about the drbd-user mailing list