Note: "permalinks" may not be as permanent as we would like,
direct links of old sources may well be a few messages off.
How much risk does this entail? Is the git image stable enough for production use? > -----Original Message----- > From: Ante Karamatić [mailto:ivoks at grad.hr] > Sent: Sunday, June 28, 2009 04:23 > To: Scott Inderlied > Cc: drbd-user at lists.linbit.com > Subject: Re: [DRBD-user] conundrum > > Scott Inderlied wrote: > > > I'm not concerned about whether it will work or not as is. I'd simply like > > to take advantage of an advancement if advantages accrue. For me it's really > > more of a question of the difficulty upgrading later may pose. If I install > > now with the latest stable DRBD and heartbeat2 and wish to upgrade sometime > > in the future, will this present great difficulties? I may not want to > > upgrade with this new release, but probably will at some point (v. 9 > > perhaps), and I wish to avoid as many problems as I can which could result > > in downtime. > > Since heartbeat2 isn't being developed any more and is, practically, > being replaced with pacemaker, I'd suggest using pacemaker+openais and > latest git snapshot of drbd8. git snapshot has only one patch against > 8.3.2rc2.