Note: "permalinks" may not be as permanent as we would like,
direct links of old sources may well be a few messages off.
Dominik Klein a écrit : >> I don't understand why this policy is very rarely used. >> > > Well, the "older" primary is presumably the one with more changes. So > why automatically throw away that instead of the presumably "less" > changes on the "younger" primary? > > That's just my explanation for it though. > > >> And in case of "discard-younger-primary" policy, node1 will be selected >> as the sync source. Am I right ? >> > > Yes. > > If I could give an answer on the rest of this E-Mail, I would have, so > please don't ask why I didn't :) > > > Thank you for your light Dominik. Anybody else for my example ? -- Hervé GAUTIER