[DRBD-user] Resize DRBD / XFS without LVM

cosmih cosmih at gmail.com
Wed Dec 2 11:05:44 CET 2009

Note: "permalinks" may not be as permanent as we would like,
direct links of old sources may well be a few messages off.


Hi Stefan,

On my setup the metadata is on a separate disk partition, so it is
still needed the dumping of the metadata ?
Also, the grow of the disk partition is like: delete the partition ->
create a new one bigger with the same id? The bigger one need to use
the same cylinders?

Thank you,

--
cosmih

On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 11:13 AM, Stefan Priebe - allied internet ag
<s.priebe at allied-internet.ag> wrote:
>
> Yes that's right. I was simply using the commands explained at this url :-)
>
>>>> 1) put the DRBD resources into secondary mode (on each server)
> no simply drbdadm down resource on both
>
>>>> 2) stop the DRBD service on each server
> no
>
>>>> 3) resize the disk partition used for the DRBD devices on each
>>server (the disk partition used as meta-disk is not modified)
> NO first dump the metadata
> drbdadm dump-md resource > /tmp/metadata
>
> then you can grow the device - then reimport metadata and then drbd up.
> Then Filesystem resize.
>
> Stefan
>
> cosmih schrieb:
>> Hi Stefan,
>>
>> I mean the offline growing, because from the information available on
>> the specified URL I understands that the online rezise is possible
>> only when the DRBD device is on top of a LVM volume.
>>
>> Thank you,
>>
>> --
>> cosmih
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 10:46 AM, Stefan Priebe - allied internet ag
>> <s.priebe at allied-internet.ag> wrote:
>>> Hi!
>>>
>>> Do you mean the offline growing or online growing? About the online
>>> growing i don't know anything :-) I haven't tested it at all.
>>>
>>> Stefan
>>>
>>> cosmih schrieb:
>>>> Hi Stefan,
>>>>
>>>> Are you so kind to detail a little bit more the growing process
>>>> (because on the URL provided is vague) ? The steps are something likes
>>>> below ?
>>>> 1) put the DRBD resources into secondary mode (on each server)
>>>> 2) stop the DRBD service on each server
>>>> 3) resize the disk partition used for the DRBD devices on each server
>>>> (the disk partition used as meta-disk is not modified)
>>>> 4) start the DRBD service on each server (at this step the two DRBD
>>>> devices will be into secondary mode)
>>>> 5) put one DRBD device into primary mode
>>>> 6) resize the filesystem on top the primary DRBD device
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thank you,
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> cosmih
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 2:56 PM, Stefan Priebe - allied internet ag
>>>> <s.priebe at allied-internet.ag> wrote:
>>>>> Hi!
>>>>>
>>>>> I've done an offline migration cause - we don't use LVM and without LVM
>>>>> online migration is not possible.
>>>>>
>>>>> So i can only tell you that the offline one
>>>>> (http://www.drbd.org/users-guide/s-resizing.html) is working fine :-)
>>>>>
>>>>> Stefan
>>>>>
>>>>> cosmih schrieb:
>>>>>> Hi Stefan,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Do you succeed on your XFS, on top of DRBD, growth attempt ?
>>>>>> I am curious on this because I also need to do a growth of my DRBD device.
>>>>>> Here is my setup:
>>>>>> 1) Heartbeat standby/active over DRBD secondary/primary setup
>>>>>> 2) DRBD 8.0.16
>>>>>> 3) HW RAID 10 --> sda6, 350GB disk partition; sda7, 1GB disk partition
>>>>>> --> drbd0, DRBD device on sda6; meta-disk on sda7  --> LVM PV --> one
>>>>>> LVM VG --> two LVM LV --> ext3 (meaning that the DRBD device use as
>>>>>> its storage a disk partition and there is LVM on top of DRBD and there
>>>>>> is ext3 on top of LVM)
>>>>>> What I need ?
>>>>>> Basically, I need more space on DRBD device, meaning from 350GB to
>>>>>> 450GB and I have this free space on HW RAID 10 volume.
>>>>>> Because the DRBD setup is used by some applications who need a very
>>>>>> high uptime I am interested by a solution for this growth who use the
>>>>>> secondary/primary feature of DRBD and the standby/active feature of
>>>>>> heartbeat or, at least, need a very low downtime.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I would appreciate any advices.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thank you,
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> cosmih
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Yes of cause HW Raid.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'll do a test today - i've already prepared testequipment yesterday.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Stefan
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Stefan Seifert schrieb:
>>>>>>>> On Tuesday 24 November 2009 11:03:11 you wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> No you haven't. Like newer versions of fdisk you can use partprobe to
>>>>>>>>>> tell the kernel to re-read partition tables.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>> Stefan
>>>>>>>>> Thanks Stefan for your answer. I know partprobe - but does it work on a
>>>>>>>>> mounted partition?
>>>>>>>> For all I know it should work with a mounted partition as well. If the
>>>>>>>> partition were not mounted or otherwise used, you wouldn't need partprobe.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> And I assume "mounted" in this context means "used as drbd storage device".
>>>>>>>> I also assume that by RAID you mean some hardware RAID, because partitioning
>>>>>>>> an MD RAID wouldn't make much sense.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Like with all these things it's a very good idea to first test it on a test
>>>>>>>> system. Ideally identical machines, but if not available at least some VM (we
>>>>>>>> use qemu for that and though its pretty slow, its enough for such tests). Life
>>>>>>>> gets so much more relaxed, if you don't have to experiment around with your
>>>>>>>> production machines :)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>> Stefan
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> drbd-user mailing list
>>>>>> drbd-user at lists.linbit.com
>>>>>> http://lists.linbit.com/mailman/listinfo/drbd-user
>



More information about the drbd-user mailing list