Note: "permalinks" may not be as permanent as we would like,
direct links of old sources may well be a few messages off.
Art Age Software wrote: >> Has anyone given a compelling argument against moving from 8.0 to 8.2? I >> didn't see one. > > My argument is that I don't want to risk the stability of my > high-availability architecture on a version of DRBD (8.2) that is > being actively developed with new features, any of which could > conceivably bring new bugs and failure modes to the base > functionality. I want the 8.0.x stable branch, in which only bugs and > security issues are addressed. This is why the 8.0 branch exists. > Otherwise, Linbit would simply kill it and tell everyone to move to > 8.2. I could be wrong here, but I seem to remember that this has been strongly implied (that 8.0 support is being phased out). Gordan