[DRBD-user] [PATCH] dopd should notify when peer is dead (was "Refusing to be Primary while peer is not outdated" when peer is dead?)

Wolfram Schlich lists at wolfram.schlich.org
Mon Mar 10 12:05:08 CET 2008

Note: "permalinks" may not be as permanent as we would like,
direct links of old sources may well be a few messages off.


* Lars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg at linbit.com> [2008-03-10 12:00]:
> On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 08:54:35AM +0100, Wolfram Schlich wrote:
> > * Wolfram Schlich <lists at wolfram.schlich.org> [2008-03-04 09:39]:
> > > * Lars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg at linbit.com> [2008-02-28 15:56]:
> > > > On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 10:22:01PM +0100, Wolfram Schlich wrote:
> > > > > This is a really nasty bug and renders the cluster kinda useless,
> > > > > because the failover node won't run the resources (that depend on
> > > > > drbd) when the active node dies. Is this assumption correct?
> > > > > 
> > > > > If yes, I should stop using that broken dopd ASAP... :>
> > > > 
> > > > if you use heartbeat 2.1.3, and it dopd does causes these "handler
> > > > broken, returned 20" kernel messages, then yes, you happen to use the
> > > > broken dopd, and should stop doing so until we release a (hot?)fix.
> > > 
> > > Ok. So, is it still hot? :) What's the plan?
> > > I'd like to include the patch in my Gentoo Heartbeat packages.
> > 
> > No news so far?!
> 
> internal testing is completed now,
> we do a final review later this day,
> commit to heartbeat mercurial will follow. 

Great :)
Can you please post the changeset id to the list afterwards?
Thanks!
-- 
Regards,
Wolfram Schlich <wschlich at gentoo.org>
Gentoo Linux * http://dev.gentoo.org/~wschlich/



More information about the drbd-user mailing list