Note: "permalinks" may not be as permanent as we would like,
direct links of old sources may well be a few messages off.
> I may be wrong, but I think on intel/amd > ext3 is still limited to < 8TiB ? Not sure about this but even 8tb would be acceptable. > and, btw, > ever seen e2fsck on a multi terabyte device? This is the only reason i'm looking into replication with DRBD. We absolutely cannot have downtime for fsck. Also ext3 will be upgradeable into ext4 and/or btrfs. > why not go for XFS? > seems to be a better choice for device sizes in that range. I thought XFS was good for large files? We're doing everything from databases to mail servers to virtual environments on this storage system. I'm definitely open to suggestions. Best Regards, Artur eBoundHost http://www.eboundhost.com