Note: "permalinks" may not be as permanent as we would like,
direct links of old sources may well be a few messages off.
While reading your answer I realize that I may have not thought about the consequences well enough :) However, thanks the for detailed explaination. Robert Lars Ellenberg schrieb: > right. short acces times for reads. > low latency for small, random, reads. > > and you want to add in network latency, > where you now have only "local disk" latency. > > especially for latency, it is best to stay on "local disk" for reads. > unless your network latency is neglectable in comparison with your > local disk latency. which is not the case in my experience. > > with typical GbE latency, it will rather double the "access time". >