Note: "permalinks" may not be as permanent as we would like,
direct links of old sources may well be a few messages off.
On 11/20/07, D. Dante Lorenso <dante at lorenso.com> wrote: > Lars Ellenberg wrote: > > why would you need synchronous replication, why would rsync not do? > > Currently rsync does the job. With synchronous replication, though, I'd > be able to write a file locally then trigger a remote job to begin using > that file immediately. Rsync works but is slow and we are syncing such > a large number of files that the sync consumes a great deal of resources > on both the sending and receiving sides. I've also been meaning to look > into csync2. Perhaps csync2+inotify could acelerate things, as explained here: http://lists.linbit.com/pipermail/drbd-user/2007-March/006590.html But i never prove it, so take it as where it comes from (somebody who never do it ;) Thanks, Rodrigo