Note: "permalinks" may not be as permanent as we would like,
direct links of old sources may well be a few messages off.
On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 02:21:53PM +0100, Mark Watts wrote: > > > On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 01:05:54PM +0100, Mark Watts wrote: > > > > > It can be one of the following three: > > > > > > > > > > C: write IO is reported as completed, if we know it has > > > > > reached _both_ local and remote DISK. > > > > > * for critical transactional data. > > > > > > > > * for most cases. > > > > > > Most ? > > > > what is your question? > > > > C: write IO is reported as completed, if we know it has > reached _both_ local and remote DISK. > > * for most cases. > > In what circumstances does this not hold to be true (that data is on the > platters of both disks?) 1. misunderstanding: in that post, read the "*" as "this setting is recommended ..." 2. the statement holds not true when you lose connectivity, obviously: if you cannot communicate with the peer, it cannot write your data. -- : Lars Ellenberg Tel +43-1-8178292-0 : : LINBIT Information Technologies GmbH Fax +43-1-8178292-82 : : Vivenotgasse 48, A-1120 Vienna/Europe http://www.linbit.com : __ please use the "List-Reply" function of your email client.