Note: "permalinks" may not be as permanent as we would like,
direct links of old sources may well be a few messages off.
Am Dienstag, 27. Februar 2007 19:09 schrieb lars: > go, bug them! I bugged the Debian kernel team instead - #412748. > an other hint: you definetly want to increase the ocfs2 heartbeat > "retries" so it is much higher than any drbd timeout might be. > with the default of (iirc) 7, both ocfs2 nodes may decide to fence > themselves whithin some seconds when the network has some hickups. Is O2CB_HEARTBEAT_THRESHOLD=16 considered to be enough (i.e. 30s fencing time when I understand it correctly, compared to the drbd defaults of between 6 and 10s)? > and try to not run into oom conditions... How would it if only a few user processes are running? Are the drbd and/or ocfs kernel threads known to leak memory? Or are you referring to something else here? > > Or is GFS2 better or even the "recommended" file system for > > primary/primary drbd volumes? > > we don't "recommend" anything yet. I believe ocfs2 is more lightweight > and would be easier to setup/maintain. but that is just me... But are there any practical experiences right now or am I trying something "yes, it might work, but is right now completely untested/unsupported/not expected to work/brkoen und you get to keep the pieces if your machine transforms into a fireball"? > hope we hear a happy success story soon? Yeah, me too... Rene -- ------------------------------------------------- Gibraltar firewall http://www.gibraltar.at/ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.linbit.com/pipermail/drbd-user/attachments/20070227/4d148d40/attachment.pgp>