Note: "permalinks" may not be as permanent as we would like,
direct links of old sources may well be a few messages off.
/ 2006-09-28 15:35:22 -0700 \ jeffb: > Well, it seems that my cohort here at work went to set up the latest > stable drbd with vanilla kernel 2.6.18 and found that it was looking for > some devfs header files. As I understand it, devfs was removed from the > kernel as of 2.6.18. Are we looking at a situation where we've got no > version of drbd that works with the current kernel, or are we just doing > something stupid. this is already fixed in svn. svn co http://svn.drbd.org/drbd/branches/drbd-0.7/ as of revision 2443, there is no functional change against 0.7.21 yet, but the devfs code has been bracketed with #ifdef's. > I double checked with him, and it sounds like we're running off the > kernel that was just compiled from that source (we needed Areca > support). > > If this is just a no current kernel situation, is there any estimate of > how long before there's a new version of drbd? Should we try the current > CVS? He said he tried the 0.8pre that's current too, but with the same > results. Should we just go back the 2.6.17.x? ETA drbd 0.7.22 early next week, since we have a known real bug pending, too. -- : Lars Ellenberg Tel +43-1-8178292-0 : : LINBIT Information Technologies GmbH Fax +43-1-8178292-82 : : Schoenbrunner Str. 244, A-1120 Vienna/Europe http://www.linbit.com : __ please use the "List-Reply" function of your email client.