Note: "permalinks" may not be as permanent as we would like,
direct links of old sources may well be a few messages off.
On Sat, Jul 29, 2006 at 10:00:49PM +0200, Ondrej Jombik wrote: > On Sat, 29 Jul 2006, Luciano Miguel Ferreira Rocha wrote: > > >On Sat, Jul 29, 2006 at 09:27:08PM +0200, Ondrej Jombik wrote: > >>- partition-A (service-A) will be master on machine1 and slave on machine2 > >>- partition-B (service-B) will be master on machine2 and slave on machine1 > >>Is this possible? > >>Does someone have this in production? > >Yes, just configure two different drbd resources. > > Thank you for your answer. I thought that this is possible. > Anyone having this in production is welcomed to tell us so. I do. > Also I'm interested in you personal opinion if you consider this > solution as a clever/good one. I'm not the expert in the topic, thus it > is rather difficult for me to think about any drawbacks or possible > problems that this setup can bring. You're distributing your load between two machines. That's a good thing to do. An otherwise idle server will be put to good use instead of just waiting for the other to fail. I see no drawback, only benefits, assuming that there's no convoluted dependency between them. -- lfr 0/0