Note: "permalinks" may not be as permanent as we would like,
direct links of old sources may well be a few messages off.
There should be a performance hit if you are using protocol C. Remember that in protocol C, writes are not considered committed unless you have written to both machines. So if your primary has a super fast raid controller that can give you writes in the order or greater than100MB/s and the other computer simply has a single drive that can only do say 30 MB/s then your will be limited to the speed of the second node. Reads don't really matter as there is no data needed to be replicated during reads. I am not sure, but I think I read before that there is some magic in the drbd code where host 1 could read through the DRBD connection data on host 2 or something like that, but I may be totally wrong. Diego khaja mohideen wrote: > Hi, > > The primary server(Host A) runs on Hardware RAID5. > The Secondary Server (Host B) runs on non RAID. Can i > use drbd effectively. Any Impacts(read/write) or > considerations before implementing this. > > > Pls Suggest. > > Regards, > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > http://mail.yahoo.com > _______________________________________________ > drbd-user mailing list > drbd-user at lists.linbit.com > http://lists.linbit.com/mailman/listinfo/drbd-user >