Note: "permalinks" may not be as permanent as we would like,
direct links of old sources may well be a few messages off.
Lars Ellenberg wrote: >\ Diego Liziero: >> [...] >> We didn't try to change the configuration. >> >> We can do some more tests next Wednesday afternoon, >> but we have few minutes available where all >> the cluster services may be stopped. > >so what is the current situation? back to 0.6? Yes, back to 0.6.12 > [..] >> Here is what is left on my remote xterminal from yesterday: >> version: 0.7.13 (api:77/proto:74) >> SVN Revision: 1942 build by root at .. , 2005-09-12 12:44:26 >> 0: cs:Connected st:Primary/Secondary ld:Consistent >> ns:50789466 nr:0 dw:40 dr:50789583 al:3 bm:9300 lo:0 pe:0 ua:0 ap:0 >> 1: cs:Connected st:Primary/Secondary ld:Consistent >> ns:8555234 nr:0 dw:170636 dr:8451935 al:207 bm:1536 lo:0 pe:0 ua:0 ap:0 >> 2: cs:Connected st:Primary/Secondary ld:Consistent >> ns:8615170 nr:0 dw:231256 dr:8434619 al:43 bm:1536 lo:0 pe:0 ua:0 ap:0 >> 3: cs:Connected st:Primary/Secondary ld:Consistent >> ns:8397222 nr:0 dw:12184 dr:8389563 al:56 bm:1536 lo:0 pe:0 ua:0 ap:0 >> 4: cs:Connected st:Primary/Secondary ld:Consistent >> ns:8385898 nr:0 dw:145 dr:8534575 al:2 bm:1536 lo:0 pe:0 ua:0 ap:0 >> 5: cs:SyncSource st:Primary/Secondary ld:Consistent >> ns:4716200 nr:0 dw:60688 dr:5035525 al:250 bm:32608 lo:0 pe:53 ua:2019 ap:0 >> [>...................] sync'ed: 1.8% (254025/258577)M >> finish: 7:22:23 speed: 9,756 (8,336) K/sec > >is it already mounted and serving? Yes, mounted and used. >> The conf file part of the 5th partition is: >> >> resource Mail { >> protocol C; >> syncer { >> rate 500M; > >maybe better set this to something like what is actually physically possible. >say, if you have seen a maximum sync transfer rate of 27M, set it to 30M. I supposed that M was megabit/sec, we have a Gigabit Ethernet dedicated link, and actually we reached 480 megabit/sec during the resync process. > [..] >> group 6; > >ok, so I guess all of them are in different sync groups, right? Right. >> } >> disk /dev/cciss/c0d0p12; >> meta-disk /dev/cciss/c0d0p14 [5]; > >looks fine. > >can you somehow verify that the > meta-disk /dev/cciss/c0d0p14 [5]; >has no physical problems? It's a partition in a raid 5 controller virtual disk. The controller gives us no error on disks. Diego.