[DRBD-user] Active node conflict

paddy paddy at panici.net
Wed Nov 2 09:51:41 CET 2005

Note: "permalinks" may not be as permanent as we would like,
direct links of old sources may well be a few messages off.


On Wed, Nov 02, 2005 at 09:20:56AM +0100, jlarrea at gadisa.es wrote:
> 
> -----drbd-user-bounces at lists.linbit.com escribió: -----
> 
> 
> Para: drbd-user at lists.linbit.com
> De: paddy <paddy at panici.net>
> Enviado por: drbd-user-bounces at lists.linbit.com
> Fecha: 02/11/2005 09:13
> Asunto: Re: [DRBD-user] Active node conflict
> 
> On Wed, Nov 02, 2005 at 08:41:25AM +0100, jlarrea at gadisa.es wrote:
> >
> >
> > Hi all,
> > Today morning I've noticed that I was not able to access to my files
> stored
> > on a RH-EL 3 (Kernel 2.4) + Heartbeat, stonith and drbd 0.7.11 samba
> > cluster. The question is that I see the two nodes up, one of them with
> drbd
> > resources acquired, but the other one with samba processes up. I've
> > restarted one of them and everything solved, but I don't know what
> > happened. I'm thinking on a network failure during night, but not sure.
> May
> > be both nodes lost heartbeat connection and decided to be 'Active' and
> when
> > network restores connection they don't know what to do, notr sure. But
> what
> > can I do to prevent this?
> 
> >timeout for drbd failover shorter than the heartbeat one ?

> Maybe, I don't know how long is timeout for DRBD, I haven't put any
> parameter about this on drbd.conf.

Apologies.  I really shouldn't post before coffee in the morning :)

heartbeat and drbd should log in some detail, please look at the logs.

Regards,
Paddy
-- 
Perl 6 will give you the big knob. -- Larry Wall



More information about the drbd-user mailing list