Note: "permalinks" may not be as permanent as we would like,
direct links of old sources may well be a few messages off.
On Wed, Nov 02, 2005 at 09:20:56AM +0100, jlarrea at gadisa.es wrote: > > -----drbd-user-bounces at lists.linbit.com escribió: ----- > > > Para: drbd-user at lists.linbit.com > De: paddy <paddy at panici.net> > Enviado por: drbd-user-bounces at lists.linbit.com > Fecha: 02/11/2005 09:13 > Asunto: Re: [DRBD-user] Active node conflict > > On Wed, Nov 02, 2005 at 08:41:25AM +0100, jlarrea at gadisa.es wrote: > > > > > > Hi all, > > Today morning I've noticed that I was not able to access to my files > stored > > on a RH-EL 3 (Kernel 2.4) + Heartbeat, stonith and drbd 0.7.11 samba > > cluster. The question is that I see the two nodes up, one of them with > drbd > > resources acquired, but the other one with samba processes up. I've > > restarted one of them and everything solved, but I don't know what > > happened. I'm thinking on a network failure during night, but not sure. > May > > be both nodes lost heartbeat connection and decided to be 'Active' and > when > > network restores connection they don't know what to do, notr sure. But > what > > can I do to prevent this? > > >timeout for drbd failover shorter than the heartbeat one ? > Maybe, I don't know how long is timeout for DRBD, I haven't put any > parameter about this on drbd.conf. Apologies. I really shouldn't post before coffee in the morning :) heartbeat and drbd should log in some detail, please look at the logs. Regards, Paddy -- Perl 6 will give you the big knob. -- Larry Wall