Note: "permalinks" may not be as permanent as we would like,
direct links of old sources may well be a few messages off.
Does anyone have any benchmarks on whether drbd performs better with 2.6 than it does 2.4? We're happy with our current mail stores using linux 2.4 but I have the opportunity to upgrade to a 2.6 kernel. One reason for 2.6 is the directory hashing in ext3 but I'd like some reasons for drbd also. Jeff -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.linbit.com/pipermail/drbd-user/attachments/20051101/04d26396/attachment.pgp>