Note: "permalinks" may not be as permanent as we would like,
direct links of old sources may well be a few messages off.
On 2005-03-23T16:49:53, Brett Bolen <hbbolen at yahoo.com> wrote:
> How is the performance when the primary fails, and it is running
> as diskless client?
Pretty close (80-90%) to the minimum of network bandwidth vs disk
bandwidth.
So slower than local disk (in particular for reads; writes would have
went over the network anyway), but better than crashing the application,
thus allowing for graceful switch-over instead.
Sincerely,
Lars Marowsky-Brée <lmb at suse.de>
--
High Availability & Clustering
SUSE Labs, Research and Development
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH - A Novell Business