Note: "permalinks" may not be as permanent as we would like,
direct links of old sources may well be a few messages off.
On Wed, Jul 06, 2005 at 05:54:15PM +0200, Matthias Weigel wrote: > Hellp paddy, > > paddy wrote: > >On Wed, Jul 06, 2005 at 03:44:48PM +0200, Matthias Weigel wrote: > > > > > >>From: Matthias Weigel <matthias.weigel at maweos.de> > >>To: paddy <paddy at panici.net> > >>Subject: Re: [DRBD-user] Using DRBD between hosts with dual redundant > >>network > >> interfaces > >> > >>Hello, > >> > >>if you want to do it outside of drbd, there is another option: OSPF. > >> > >>(I have not done this with drbd yet, only with other daemons!) > >>- setup an extra lo interface on each box, e.g. lo:2 > >>- configure drbd to only use the ip of this extra lo interface > > > > > >I tried this before I went to ipip, what I got was: > > > ># ifconfig lo:0 192.168.2.1 up > >black:~# ping 192.168.2.2 > >PING 192.168.2.2 (192.168.2.2) 56(84) bytes of data. > >64 bytes from 192.168.2.2: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.324 ms > >... > > > >even if I set up a route for it. I imagined this is part of the magic of > >lo. > >I thought about looking for the thing i wanted, but at that point the > >tunneling possibility was nagging at me so I went that way. > > > >so how do you do this step ? something with iproute perhaps ? > > > Where is your problem? You got a successful ping didn't you? ;) yes, but I'm just pinging the same loopback, even when I put in a route the packet never touches the wire (I tcpdump'd it) (I tried something like route -add 192.168.2.2 gw 192.168.0.2) Just the same as if I ping 127.0.0.2 Don't take my word for it, Try it! I'm on debian linux 2.6.8, but its been that way on linux for as long as I recall. Perhaps your use of osdf magics this problem away without you noticing, or perhaps I'm missing a trick here. Obviously it works for you. I'd really like to figure out what I'm missing! Regards, Paddy -- Perl 6 will give you the big knob. -- Larry Wall