Note: "permalinks" may not be as permanent as we would like,
direct links of old sources may well be a few messages off.
Hi, On Wednesday 26 January 2005 17:47, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote: > On 2005-01-26T17:19:35, Yannick Lecaillez <yl at itioweb.com> wrote: > > But i'm seeing a lot of problem on the list about OOpsses and other > > corruption > > with 0.7.x. > > Which version, and with what base-kernel? > > But: 0.7 is certainly much better tested on 2.6 than on 2.4, and I would > recommend that you upgrade to a 2.6 based system. Comparing the speed, yeah, 2.6.7 was much faster on our systems than 2.4.x. Comparing the stability, it depends. Our main fileserver every morning crashed with page allocation errors. Almost nobody on LKML was interested in it and I also didn't see anything on LKML stating that this could be fixed :( So we had to switch back to 2.4.x. Now its running stable and never touch a running system..., even when its much slower. On our compute-cluster-server however, 2.6.9 seems to run more stable than 2.4.27 (probably since its a x86-64 system). Cheers, Bernd