Note: "permalinks" may not be as permanent as we would like,
direct links of old sources may well be a few messages off.
Helmut Wollmersdorfer wrote: > Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote: > >> Ah damn, so drbd is also affected by this. This is a recent semantic >> change in the bio handling which is also present in 2.6.10-ac10 and up. > > >> The cause is probably in drbd_actlog.c:_drbd_md_sync_page_io(), where a >> bio is allocated on the stack and then initialized via bio_init(), >> instead of being allocated as a struct bio * via bio_alloc(). > > > Hmm ... I wanted to upgrade from Kernel 2.6.8 to 2.6.10 because of the > 30% performance downgrade of my IDE/UDMA HDDs since upgrade from Kernel > 2.4. Does this mean, that I should wait? I've put a reasonably loaded system (.5 Mb/sec read, 2+ Mb/sec write) based on kernel 2.6.10 (kernel.org) and drbd 0.7.6 in production four days ago. So far, so good (knocking the wood)... Eugene -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 256 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.linbit.com/pipermail/drbd-user/attachments/20050124/5767e2aa/attachment.pgp>