Note: "permalinks" may not be as permanent as we would like,
direct links of old sources may well be a few messages off.
Hello,
Thanks for reply.
Additionaly question and ask advice.
1 Why DRBD deadlock on loopback device? Does fsync() cause deadlock?
2 Is there any idea that DRBD on huge (1G-12GB) memory base device?
NG tmpfs - tmpfs is not block device.
NG ramfs - ramfs is not block device.
NG ramdisk - too small. (up to 512MB x 16 devices?)
NG loseup + tmpfs - cause deadlock.
NG loseup + ramfs - cause deadlock.
?? LVM + many ramdisk - create big block device with join many
ramdisk(/dev/ramX).
?? MD + many ramdisk - ditto.
?? other idea??
in "Re: [DRBD-user] deadlock? NFS export DRBD on loop device on tmpfs"
<20050804053619.GA13037 at barkeeper1.linbit>
at Thu, 4 Aug 2005 07:36:19 +0200,
Lars.Ellenberg at linbit.com wrote:
> > I want memory storage NFS server, so using NFS server that export XFS
> > on DRBD on loop device on tmpfs.
> >
> > This system looks like working well, but sometimes load average
> > increase too high (up to 20) suddenly and system is hung up.
> >
> > [question]
> > 1 Someone (on Internet) say that DRBD on loop device cause
> > deadlock. Is it true?
>
> yes.
>
> >
> > 2 What mean "top of loop device" on DRBD wiki page? loop block device?
> > or network loop device?
> > DataRedundancyByDrbd / Some Do's and Don'ts
> > <URL:http://wiki.linux-ha.org/DataRedundancyByDrbd#head-25da1eb596fac86b9b39073f3a9566007cc6a505>
>
> from the context, it should be clear that loop block dev is meant.
>
> > 3 Does DRBD work well on loop device on tmpfs?
>
> no
>
> > Is there a possibility of deadlock or serious problem?
>
> yes
--
HIROSE, Masaaki