[DRBD-user] 0.6 vs. 0.7 3ware performance? [Was: Expected syncspeed for a 425gb volume?]

Nate Carlson natecars at real-time.com
Tue Apr 12 20:03:06 CEST 2005

Note: "permalinks" may not be as permanent as we would like,
direct links of old sources may well be a few messages off.


On Tue, 12 Apr 2005, Jeff Buck wrote:
> After talking to 3ware, they seem to think that part of the problem had
> to do with the drives we're using.. We've got 8 250 gig western digital
> drives. The problem is the particular model (according to them). Some of
> the western digital drives are "workstation class" drives, and when they
> see info coming in in 64K chunks, they assume it's some sort of nickle
> and dime IO from a workstation, so after a 64k chunk they seek to a
> random area of the disk (ala IBM Deathstar drive fix) to even out the
> time spent over different areas on the disk. Next 64k chunk they seek
> back, write, and seek random again. The problem being that the 3ware
> raid card is splitting the writes into 64k chunks on the different
> disks, causing them all to do a little dance after every 64k write. We
> have a bunch of the "JD" drives.. I guess the ones that don't have this
> behavior are the "SD" drives (unavailable when we started this project).

Makes a lot of sense - we've actually got two seagate and two WD (JD)
drives on each controller.

-- 
Nate Carlson <natecars at real-time.com>   | Phone : (952)943-8700
http://www.real-time.com                | Fax   : (952)943-8500




More information about the drbd-user mailing list