Note: "permalinks" may not be as permanent as we would like,
direct links of old sources may well be a few messages off.
David, It will push 0.6.x out of unstable, but I don't think this is a problem, because Sarge will still still contain 0.6.x. Or what do you think? Philipp ----- Original Message ----- From: "David Krovich" <dkrovich at csee.wvu.edu> To: "Philipp Hug" <philipp at hug.cx> Cc: <drbd-user at linbit.com> Sent: Friday, September 17, 2004 9:10 AM Subject: Re: DRBD 0.7.4 > Philipp Hug wrote: >> David, >> >> I uploaded a new drbd package to: >> http://www.abanet.ch/~hug/debian/drbd/ >> >> I'm going to test them @work tomorrow as I changed a lot of things... I did >> also include the module-assistant stuff, even if it's not completly finished >> yet... >> >> Btw: We should probably request removal of the /debian/ directory in upstream >> or synchronize drbd and debian package releases. Otherwise it's a mess... >> > > Thanks for taking a crack at this, I've downloaded the packages and started > looking at them. > > I agree that it'd be easier if upstream didn't keep a version of the debian > directory in version control. We should be able to coordinate the debian > directory just within Debian itself. > > Another question/comment. If this goes into unstable, won't it push out the > 0.6.x series? I would assume some people are still more comfortable using > 0.6.x over 0.7.x, so we would want to keep both versions available. > > >