Note: "permalinks" may not be as permanent as we would like,
direct links of old sources may well be a few messages off.
Lars Ellenberg wrote: > two drbd with ca. 2TB each will do, probably. three is unlikely, and > four of that size is probably not possible currently. > this is a known problem, and will eventually be fixed. > it does not seem very hard to fix, but as long as we have the impression > that "the average drbd user" does not use several TB of storage, fixing > that has low priority... Hmm, times are changing very fast. Two years ago I had 12 GB on servers and 50 GB in total at home office. Now I have 2 x 240 GB on servers and around 1 TB in total. At last project they had 27 TB storage system on one server (for _one_ application) and 17 TB of this mirrored by 11 km fiber to an hot standby - not DRBD, obviously. Helmut Wollmersdorfer