Note: "permalinks" may not be as permanent as we would like,
direct links of old sources may well be a few messages off.
Philipp Reisner schrieb: > On Monday 24 May 2004 16:19, Helmut Wollmersdorfer wrote: [1] >>I think, other drbd-resources should work independent from the problems >>of only _one_ drbd-resource. > So, what do you suggest ? -- Not a ready to use solution. We have two "should"-(not "must"-)requirements - the [1] above and [2] "initscripts should be non-interactive" which are not 100% fullfilled by DRBD. We have workarounds. Conclusion: normal severity, normal priority. > Unfortunately heartbeat does not take hints > from DRBD. The only way to make sure that heartbeat does not activate a > resource is to not start it at all. Hmm, I assume, that other sync methods like rsync will have a similar problem, which needs to be handled by failover software. Is this missing, important functionality of heartbeat? > We are aware of the problem and working on it. But do not expect that we > will change anything in DRBD-0.6.x . ACK. Minimize the risk of new invented errors in a stable version. > Development happens at DRBD-0.7. Although it is not formal, I would > say we are already in a kind of feature freeze for 0.7. ACK. Better to have this major step forward, than additional, less important features. Helmut Wollmersdorfer