Note: "permalinks" may not be as permanent as we would like,
direct links of old sources may well be a few messages off.
Am Dienstag, 23. März 2004 09:53 schrieb Philipp Reisner: > Am Freitag, 19. März 2004 17:32 schrieb Kees Cook: > > On Fri, Mar 19, 2004 at 10:03:55AM +0100, Philipp Reisner wrote: > > > are you going to maintain these patches ? -- At least for now ? > > > > I'm happy to maintain the 2nd if the first can be put into CVS. I tried > > to make sure it wouldn't break the existing build process. It makes > > putting it into the kernel tree muuuch easier. ;) > > > > Is there anything bad about the first patch? I'm happy to clean it up as > > you see fit. > > Hi Kees, > > I have to admit that I did not realized in the first run that the first > patch was meant to be applied, and that it does not conflict with the > module build. I realized that by now and I am up to applying it. > > But: > > I am thinking about making the include directory a sub-directory > of drbd which would lead to: > > > drbd/drbd_*.c > drbd/[include/]linux/drbd.h > drbd/[include/]linux/drbd_conf.h > > * As far as I understand the woes of the packet maintainers, they would > like to see all the sourced for building the modules in one tree. > > * And a symlink in the root directory of the distribution tarball, so > that people see the drbd_conf.h in the uppermost directory. > > * Actually the [include/] part in the path is not necessary, so I > am thinking about omitting it. > > Lars, David, Philipp: Any oppinions on how the sources should be layed out, > from the viewpoint of a package maintainer ? > > -Philipp I have put it into CVS now. (Use cvs update -d to get the new directory.) Check it out, and tell me what is stupid about it :) -Philipp -- : Dipl-Ing Philipp Reisner Tel +43-1-8178292-50 : : LINBIT Information Technologies GmbH Fax +43-1-8178292-82 : : Schönbrunnerstr 244, 1120 Vienna, Austria http://www.linbit.com :