Note: "permalinks" may not be as permanent as we would like,
direct links of old sources may well be a few messages off.
Lars Ellenberg wrote: > > / 2004-03-23 09:27:17 -0500 > \ Todd Denniston: > > Lars Ellenberg wrote: > > > > > > / 2004-03-23 09:53:33 +0100 > > > \ Philipp Reisner: > > <SNIP> > > > > Lars, David, Philipp: Any oppinions on how the sources should be layed out, > > > > from the viewpoint of a package maintainer ? > > > > > > We could as well "split" it into a kernel patch, and the user level tools. > > > > > <SNIP> > > I don't think this is exactly what you are talking about, but it is related. > > As just a User, I would like to see a kernel module and user level tools > > split, on an rpm's produced level. <SNIP> > SuSE had this split since they included DRBD into their release. > I thinkg Debian has this split, too. I don't know about RH or others. > The suggested drbd.spec in the DRBD source tar ball has this split > since 0.6.10 or something. > <SNIP> sorry, just grabbed 0.6.12 and it seems to do what I wanted when making rpm's. I had been using 0.6.10, so it must have been 0.6.11. I remember you having to make several changes to the rpm process for that one... just did not know this was one of the changes there. -- Todd Denniston Crane Division, Naval Surface Warfare Center (NSWC Crane) Harnessing the Power of Technology for the Warfighter