Note: "permalinks" may not be as permanent as we would like,
direct links of old sources may well be a few messages off.
On Mon, 2004-06-14 at 09:51 +0200, Lars Ellenberg wrote: > > I saw that the 0.7 branch should work on kernel 2.6. > > But would it be crazy to use this in a production environment? > > currently that would be asking for trouble. > we have indication that under some circumstances drbd 0.7 may still > cause data inconsistencies between its mirrors [read data corruption] :( It was me who provided said indication. I've got a (crasy?) thought: could that inconsistency be caused by initially wrong meta-disk information, that does not get fully refreshed after "invalidate"? The point is that I had switched between 0.6 and 0.7 several times, and every time I changed 0.6 to 0.7, meta-disk naturally was out-of-sync with the actual data. Of course I ran "invalidate" every time, but maybe it is not sufficient? Eugene -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: <http://lists.linbit.com/pipermail/drbd-user/attachments/20040615/9e911f72/attachment.pgp>