Note: "permalinks" may not be as permanent as we would like,
direct links of old sources may well be a few messages off.
Lars Ellenberg wrote: [..] >>If the setup above is too risky I'll use rsync based replication for now. > do that. > I think, ok, you can do it that way ... > but consider this: [..] > now, what do you think may be better wrt performance and latency? Yes - you may be right. The only thing is that node3 is a 6 SCSI Drive / Raid 5 monster (Proliant DL380 G3) while node1 and node2 are smaller IDE machines (DL145). That's the only reason why I tried to put as much as possible I/O on node3. But I'll re-think my setup with rsync now. Thanks a lot for the answers! -- Daniel Khan CTO [::] webCLUSTER.at Ebretsteiner & Khan OEG Kornstrasse 10 4060 Leonding Tel: +43 (0) 732 37 09 60 | Fax: +43 (0) 732 37 09 60 10 http://www.webcluster.at | support at webcluster.at