Note: "permalinks" may not be as permanent as we would like,
direct links of old sources may well be a few messages off.
Ok ... that worked ... but when I added the second box I got this ...
All seems to have continued, but I thought I'd better let you know.
Ron
Jul 22 12:03:45 vossdir1 kernel: e1000: eth1 NIC Link is Up 100 Mbps
Full Duplex
Jul 22 12:51:24 vossdir1 kernel: drbd1: Handshake successful: DRBD
Protocol version 74
Jul 22 12:51:24 vossdir1 kernel: drbd0: Handshake successful: DRBD
Protocol version 74
Jul 22 12:51:24 vossdir1 kernel: drbd1:
/usr/local/src/drbd-0.7.0/drbd/drbd_receiver.c:1414: bitmap already
locked by /us
Jul 22 12:51:24 vossdir1 kernel: drbd0:
/usr/local/src/drbd-0.7.0/drbd/drbd_receiver.c:1414: bitmap already
locked by /us
Jul 22 12:51:24 vossdir1 kernel: Call Trace:
Jul 22 12:51:24 vossdir1 kernel: Call Trace: [<f8a4c105>]
Jul 22 12:51:24 vossdir1 kernel: [<f8a4c105>]
__drbd_bm_lock+0x105/0x14d [drbd]
Jul 22 12:51:24 vossdir1 kernel: __drbd_bm_lock+0x105/0x14d [drbd]
Jul 22 12:51:24 vossdir1 kernel: [<f8a57e18>] receive_param+0x21e/0x71d
[drbd]
Jul 22 12:51:24 vossdir1 kernel: [<f8a55aad>] [<f8a57e18>]
drbd_recv_header+0x2b/0xe6 [drbd]
Jul 22 12:51:24 vossdir1 kernel: receive_param+0x21e/0x71d [drbd]
Jul 22 12:51:24 vossdir1 kernel: [<f8a57bfa>] [<f8a55aad>]
receive_param+0x0/0x71d [drbd]
Jul 22 12:51:24 vossdir1 kernel: [<f8a58ab5>]
drbd_recv_header+0x2b/0xe6 [drbd]
Jul 22 12:51:24 vossdir1 kernel: [<f8a57bfa>] drbdd+0x59/0x13f [drbd]
Jul 22 12:51:24 vossdir1 kernel: [<f8a5958f>] receive_param+0x0/0x71d
[drbd]
Jul 22 12:51:24 vossdir1 kernel: [<f8a58ab5>] drbdd_init+0x6c/0x1b8 [drbd]
Jul 22 12:51:24 vossdir1 kernel: [<f8a5f235>] drbdd+0x59/0x13f [drbd]
Jul 22 12:51:24 vossdir1 kernel: [<f8a5958f>]
drbd_thread_setup+0x79/0xff [drbd]
Jul 22 12:51:24 vossdir1 kernel: [<f8a5f1bc>] drbdd_init+0x6c/0x1b8 [drbd]
Jul 22 12:51:24 vossdir1 kernel: [<f8a5f235>]
drbd_thread_setup+0x0/0xff [drbd]
Jul 22 12:51:24 vossdir1 kernel: drbd_thread_setup+0x79/0xff [drbd]
Jul 22 12:51:24 vossdir1 kernel: [<f8a5f1bc>] [<c0104271>]
drbd_thread_setup+0x0/0xff [drbd]
Jul 22 12:51:24 vossdir1 kernel: [<c0104271>] kernel_thread_helper+0x5/0xb
Jul 22 12:51:24 vossdir1 kernel:
Jul 22 12:51:24 vossdir1 kernel: kernel_thread_helper+0x5/0xb
Jul 22 12:51:24 vossdir1 kernel: drbd0: Connection established.
Jul 22 12:51:24 vossdir1 kernel:
Jul 22 12:51:24 vossdir1 kernel: drbd1: Connection established.
Jul 22 12:51:24 vossdir1 kernel: drbd0: Primary/Unknown -->
Primary/Secondary
Jul 22 12:51:24 vossdir1 kernel: drbd1: Primary/Unknown -->
Primary/Secondary
Jul 22 12:51:24 vossdir1 kernel: drbd0: Resync started as SyncSource
(need to sync 4063232 KB [1015808 bits set]).
Jul 22 12:51:24 vossdir1 kernel: drbd1: Resync started as SyncSource
(need to sync 4063232 KB [1015808 bits set]).
Lars Ellenberg wrote:
>/ 2004-07-21 16:47:16 +0000
>\ Ron OHara:
>
>
>>Hi Lars,
>>
>>(drbd-0.7.0 and linux 2.6.6)
>>
>>A question about initial setup ... I want to have a process for creating
>>a standalone 'Primary' DRBD disk (dont ask why :-[ )
>>
>>So I build the first box of the cluster ... there is no data ... I just
>>want to initialise a file system and be able to force this box to be the
>>'primary'.
>>
>>then:
>>
>>drbdadm up all
>>
>>drbdadm primary all
>>
>>and this complains because it is in WFConnection, Secodary/Unknown :
>>Invalid
>>This is pretty much the expected state .. and I can force it to
>>Standalone, but it still wont let me force it to Primary/Uknown so that
>>I can mount the disk R/W and make a file system on it.
>>
>>Any ideas??
>>
>>
>
>intentional behavior.
>drbadm primary all should says something like
>"Local replica is inconsistent (--do-what-I-say ?)"
>
>so it already gives you that hint: it needs to be forced,
>and you need to give it that additional option.
>
>now, since it is not a drbdadm option, but a drbdsetup option,
>you'd need to use drbsetup...
>but drbdadm is able to pass options to drbdsetup:
>
>USAGE: drbdadm [OPTION...] [-- DRBDSETUP-OPTION...] COMMAND {all|RESOURCE...}
>
>so, what you actually want to do is
> drbdadm -- --do-what-I-say primary all
>but you should be sure that you really mean what you say!
>
>
>
>>Ron
>>(PS: I'm deliberately building what starts life as a degraded cluster
>>..with later upgrade possible without reconfiguration)
>>
>>
>
>sounds reasonable...
>
> Lars Ellenberg
>_______________________________________________
>drbd-user mailing list
>drbd-user at lists.linbit.com
>http://lists.linbit.com/mailman/listinfo/drbd-user
>
>