Note: "permalinks" may not be as permanent as we would like,
direct links of old sources may well be a few messages off.
/ 2004-07-21 19:47:27 +0000 \ Florin Cazacu: > >please make sure you use the latest drbd (at least svn revision 1439, > >which is 0.7.0.tgz iirc) THIS IS IMPORTANT! if you use anything > >before that, you will have lots of problems... btw, modinfo drbd > >should tell you the revision, and some other things. > > > > > > > hmm, I used 0.7.0.tgz, but the svn version is 1438 ok. > >note that currently xfs seems to still have lots of problems anyways... > >I know because I know the SuSE kernel-of-the-day, and they have many > >patches for xfs in there, too. > > > > > > > you mean xfs+drbd, not xfs itself, right? Anyway, i'm stressing ext3 > +drbd for now, and I'm pretty sure i'll use it in production. no, I mean xfs itself. and in combination with drbd, it shows. but, I don't know the details. though xfs seems to run just fine on drbd on the old linbit test cluster (one SMP, one UP)... > It's looking to me that i use the latest version (0.7.0) but not the > last svn version. I see nothing else that could modify this, maybe the > patch posted earlier on the list? well, I'm busy committing parts and pieces, but nothing that important internally since 1438 (1439 appears to just be the svn cp . tag/drbd-0.7.0, nothing changed.) So I guess I need to be able to reproduce this myself before I can start to debug it... until then just don't use xfs :( lmb? any word on drbd+xfs from suse testlabs? Lars Ellenberg